Beware of Ministry of Labour

| Tuesday, March 30th, 2010 | 2 Comments »

 

An individual’s experience, related below, provides an example of why you should be careful when you call the Ministry of Labour. 

Following her termination, an individual contacted the Ontario Ministry of Labour, seeking advice about her situation. She had not yet contacted a lawyer and the ministry representative who was randomly assigned to pick up the phone did not immediately encourage her to do so. 

The two spoke at length about her matter. The individual explained that she had not been paid termination or severance pay, at which point she was encouraged to make a statutory complaint. This was the first error. The ministry enforces the provincial legislation only, but it does not provide a remedy for common law damages such as wrongful dismissal, which in this case actually made up the bulk of this person’s claim. 

Without training in employment law, neither the ministry representative nor the individual realized their mistake. As a long-term employee, this person was entitled to considerably more than what the Ontario Employment Standards Act could offer. As well, since the legislation caps damages at $10,000, which courts do not, the individual had an upper limit to her claim. 

Although the ministry could easily address and then remedy her complaint, this was not the problem. It was that once it has taken steps to do so, an individual loses the right to file a wrongful dismissal claim. Here, since this person’s damages were in excess of the statutory minimum, the bulk of her damages then would be relinquished – an issue that most employment lawyers would spot as a matter of course.   

The ministry has safeguards, but they are not always effective. No surprise there. After most complaints are made, the ministry mails the claimant a standard form letter explaining that if the complaint is not withdrawn within two weeks, the claimant will not be able to file a wrongful dismissal claim. However, since most people will believe, even if incorrectly, that they received “advice” from the ministry, they are unlikely to withdraw their complaint or later pay for a lawyer’s time to obtain a second opinion. The result is that they are then stuck with their original claim. 

This example is not an exception. The ministry’s hotline, which fields calls from prospective complaints, should explain only what the Act says and how it may have been interpreted in the past. There is no mandate to provide recommendations, or worse, to provide advice. Yet it happens anyway when some of the Ministry’s representatives habitually blur this distinction.  When they do, the public’s interests may be subverted.

– Daniel A. Lublin is an employment lawyer with the law firm Whitten & Lublin LLP. Reach him at dan@toronto-employmentlawyer.com

Related posts:

  1. A Very Expensive Phone Call
  2. Open for Business- Proposed changes to the Employment Standards Act, 2000
  3. Common misconceptions about workplace rights
  4. Supercalifragilistic-Please-Pay-me-my-Wages
  5. Toronto Police Officer Fired After Filing Harassment Complaint

2 Comments

  1. Deanna Jean Patawaran says:

    I read your article regarding MOL,making complaints.

    I am hoping that you can review and see if I have a case.

    I am hired as a Hospitality Consultant by Noorani Holdings Limited who owns Holiday Inn Express and Suites in Newmarket. Being hired as a Hospitality Consultant was the idea of the owner named Mr. Barkat Ismail. He also owns other 3 IHG (Intercontinental Hotels) in Canada and apartments.

    As a hospitality consultant we have agreed that he will extend a paid 3-week vacation and dry cleaning services. He is a person who never signs any written agreement and always try to do everything verbally. Working with Mr. Barkat Ismail made me realize the reason for his purpose of not signing anything, because he do a lot of unethical work labour practice. He expect us to sign for everything but not him in return. However, I do have a letter of agreement that I have sent to him. I can forward you this letter of agreement for your reference.

    I have a list of complaints on how unethical work habits, bullying in the workplace, non compliance of the Ontario Health and Safety Act and many more.

    I am hoping that you can assist me on my concerns, be able to get what I have worked for and be able to get Noorani Holdings Limited what he deserves.

    Myself and other staff (employed and non-existent employee) have witness his unethical work habits.

    I know we can build a case against him.

    You can contact me via e-mail at dpatawaran4@hotmail.com if you require further information.

    Thank you.

  2. danlublin says:

    Hi Deanna,

    Thank you for your comment.

    Up front, we must point out that we cannot provide legal advice over the internet or in this manner. We require any client to come in and meet for a formal consultation where our lawyers can discuss with you your legal rights, the law, remedies, and a strategy that ‘fits’ with your situation.

    We do not provide a free consultation. Please contact us at the following information in order to discuss a meeting:

    dan@toronto-employmentlawyer.com
    Whitten & Lublin LLP | Employment Lawyers
    Tel: 416-640-1583
    Fax: 416-644-5198

Leave a Reply