Daniel A. Lublin is a Toronto Employment Lawyer, specializing in the law of wrongful dismissal. He can be reached by email or you can visit his firm’s website.

Contact Information

317 Adelaide St. West, Suite 1001
Toronto, Ontario
M5V 1P9 
Tel (416) 640-1583

Human Rights

November 12, 2007

Head scarf issue leads to head ache

Canadian entrepreneur Sarah Desrosiers, is facing a legal battle after she denied employment to Bushra Noah because Noah would not abandon her traditional headscarf and display her hair if hired to work in the salon.

Desrosiers' London, England based Wedge Salon plans to battle Noah's suit. The small business owner claims that salon workers should showcase their hair to market their ability and essentially, their product. Noah, who has previous experience in salons, feels her headscarf does not hinder her ability to preform salon duties.

In respect of Ontario law, the Ontario Human Rights Code protects employees from discrimiantion in employment.  As a result, they cannot be adversly treated or discriminated against based on a set of 'grounds' including race, nationality, religion etc.  Employers do have a legal defence available, however.  In the case of Desrosiers, she would have to demonstate that the requirement of the position, to not wear a headscarf, is a bone fide occupational requirement - or an essential component of the job.   

The matter is scheduled to be heard in Central London's Employment Tribunal in the new year.

For more information, please see the original Toronto Star article here.

Daniel A. Lublin is a Toronto Employment Lawyer.  He can be reached at dan@toronto-employmentlawyer.com or through his Website www.toronto-employmentlawyer.com.

May 16, 2007

Changes to Human Rights Code to Impact Litigants

Employment Law Shifts -- If it's broken, then fix it.

Daniel A. Lublin, Metro Toronto News
Published: Wednesday, May 16, 2007

Since the mid-90’s, dissatisfied litigants of Ontario’s human rights regime have bemoaned its apparent shortcomings. A blend of limitations, owing their origins to the faulty composition of Ontario’s current human rights legislation, have ultimately left discrimination complainants without adequate redress. Complainants before the Human Rights Commission wait years before a resolution is reached, or imposed. Conversely, since the Commission lacks adequate discretion to immediately dismiss unmeritorious complaints, innocent corporate respondents are burdened with defending marginal complaints.

Referring to a “broken” human rights regime, Ontario Attorney General Michael Bryant announced the passage of new legislation, intended to repair the system.  The potential for court-ordered human rights awards will inevitably change the landscape of litigation, and thus, the gamble of having a case heard at trial. Employers should be ever more willing to trade compensation for an assurance that their name won’t end up in the news.

To read the full text of the article click "Changes to Ontario's Human Rights Regime to Impact Litigants"

Subscribe



Powered by FeedBlitz